The Word “Expert” in Russian Media Discourse: Semantics and Pragmatics in Conditions of Uncertainty

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu30.2023.201

Abstract

The semantics of the word “expert” in the Russian language media space and the pragmatics of introducing expert commentary into a media text are studied using the method of content analysis and discourse analysis of expert media content. The studied media content includes interviews with experts on YouTube; expert comments introduced into the journalistic text of the leading socio-political mass media and online lifestyle media, which are in the top 10 according to Mediascope, as well as expert channels in Telegram. The method of associative experiment revealed the value-evaluative meanings attached to the word expert in the linguistic consciousness of journalism students. The relevance of the study is conditioned by the explosive increase in the use of the word expert in the Russian-language media space in the last two years, the increasing flow of requests for expert opinions on digital platforms, and the involvement of more and more humanities students in expert discourse in response to the media sphere’s demand for the formation of a stable picture of the world. The novelty of this article is predetermined by the material itself, which has not been systematically analyzed before, as well as by the approach to the research. The study has shown that in the conditions of socio-political instability and uncertainty of the future, the main function of the expert is to interpret events and orient in the modern world, which is expressed in the frequent combination of the word with verbs of speaking: explained, interpreted, analyzed. At the same time, the content of the concept of expert in the young generation of journalists is associated with such notions as high social status, communicative leadership, and realization in the media space, i. e. with those that describe a modern person immersed in the info-newsletter, an information specialist. The pragmatic element of the increase of expert media content in the media is connected, on the one hand, with the problem of media fake news, which was aggravated with the onset of the pandemic and special military operation (SMO), the problem of trust in the media, and, on the other hand, with the need for journalists to resort to the interpretation of an increasingly complex and turbulent world.

Keywords:

expert, media communication, instability, content, interpretation of reality

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

СЛОВАРИ

РАС 2002 — Русский ассоциативный словарь: в 2 т. Т. 1. От стимула к реакции. Караулов Ю. Н., Черкасова Г. А. и др. (сост.). М.: АСТ; Астрель, 2002. 781 с.

Толковый словарь 2011 — Толковый словарь русского языка с включением сведений о происхождении слов. Шведова Н. Ю. (отв. ред.). М.: Азбуковник, 2011. 1122 с.

ЛИТЕРАТУРА

С. Новостная грамотность: роль эксперта в новостных сообщениях. Коммуникации. Медиа. Дизайн. 2016, 1 (3): 8–18.

Каминская 2016 — Каминская Т. Л. Праймериз как новое слово российского медиадискурса. Мир русского слова. 2016, (4): 40–44.

Каминская, Ерохина 2022 — Каминская Т. Л., Ерохина О. В. Медиакраудсорсинг и медиакраудфандинг в цифровой среде как факторы нового комьюнити для СМИ. Медиалингвистика. 2022, 9 (2): 96–112.

Карасик 2019 — Карасик В. И. Политический эксперт как лингвокультурный типаж. Актуальные проблемы стилистики. 2019, (5): 87–95.

Ляховенко 2022 — Ляховенко О. И. Телеграм-каналы в системе экспертной и политической коммуникации в современной России. Galactica Media: Journal of Media Studies. 2022, 4 (1): 114–144.

Надолинская, Петкова 2020 — Надолинская И. В., Петкова С. М. К анализу медийных факторов рискогенности человеческого существования в условиях пандемии. В сб.: Лучшая научная статья 2020. Сборник статей XXXVIII Международного научно-исследовательского конкурса. Пенза: МЦНС «Наука и просвещение», 2020. С. 184–187.

Рацибурская 2020 — Рацибурская Л. В. Социально значимые слова в современных деривационных процессах. Мир русского слова. 2020, (2): 30–34. https://doi.org/10.24411/18111629-2020-12030

Тельнова 2022 — Тельнова И. Н. Экспертное мнение ученого в масс-медиа как новая альтметрика в условиях санкционного давления. Медиалингвистика. Вып. 9. Язык в координатах массмедиа: материалы VI Международной научной конференции (СПб., 30 июня — 2 июля 2022 г.) . Дускаева Л. Р. (науч. ред.), Малышев А. А. (отв. ред.) СПб.: Медиапапир, 2022: 524–528.

Albk 2011 — Albk E. The interaction between experts and journalists in news journalism. Journalism. 2011, (12): 335– 348. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884910392851

Carpenter, Kanver 2017 — Carpenter S., Kanver D. Journalistic expertise: A communicative approach. Communication and the Public. 2017, 2 (3): 197–209.

Hetmański 2018 — Hetmański M. Expert Knowledge: Its Structure, Functions and Limits. Studia Humana. 2018, 7 (3): 11– 20. https://doi.org/10.2478/sh-2018-0014

McCombs, Bell 1996 — McCombs M., Bell T. The agendasetting role of mass communications. An Integrated Approach to Communication Theory and Research. 1996: 93–110.

McCombs, Reynolds 2002 — McCombs M., Reynolds A. News influence on our pictures of the world. In: Bryant J., Zillmann D., Bryant J., Beth Oliver M. (eds). Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research. 2nd ed. Routledge: 1–16. https://doi. org/10.4324/9781410602428

Published

2024-04-16

How to Cite

Kaminskaya, T. L. (2024). The Word “Expert” in Russian Media Discourse: Semantics and Pragmatics in Conditions of Uncertainty. The World of Russian Word, (2), 4–10. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu30.2023.201

Issue

Section

Linguistics